linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"xemul@openvz.org" <xemul@openvz.org>,
	"yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	"hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 6/6] memcg: remove redundant check at charge
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:13:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080514171301.99e5d55e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080514170236.23c9ddd7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Because of remove refcnt patch, it's very rare case to that
mem_cgroup_charge_common() is called against a page which is accounted.

mem_cgroup_charge_common() is called when.
 1. a page is added into file cache.
 2. an anon page is _newly_ mapped.

A racy case is that a newly-swapped-in anonymous page is referred from
prural threads in do_swap_page() at the same time.
(a page is not Locked when mem_cgroup_charge() is called from do_swap_page.)

Signed-off-by : KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   34 ++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -536,28 +536,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_charge_common(stru
 	if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
 		return 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * Should page_cgroup's go to their own slab?
-	 * One could optimize the performance of the charging routine
-	 * by saving a bit in the page_flags and using it as a lock
-	 * to see if the cgroup page already has a page_cgroup associated
-	 * with it
-	 */
-retry:
-	lock_page_cgroup(page);
-	pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
-	/*
-	 * The page_cgroup exists and
-	 * the page has already been accounted.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(pc)) {
-		VM_BUG_ON(pc->page != page);
-		VM_BUG_ON(!pc->mem_cgroup);
-		unlock_page_cgroup(page);
-		goto done;
-	}
-	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
-
 	pc = kmem_cache_alloc(page_cgroup_cache, gfp_mask);
 	if (unlikely(pc == NULL))
 		goto err;
@@ -618,15 +596,10 @@ retry:
 	lock_page_cgroup(page);
 	if (unlikely(page_get_page_cgroup(page))) {
 		unlock_page_cgroup(page);
-		/*
-		 * Another charge has been added to this page already.
-		 * We take lock_page_cgroup(page) again and read
-		 * page->cgroup, increment refcnt.... just retry is OK.
-		 */
 		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
 		css_put(&mem->css);
 		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
-		goto retry;
+		goto done;
 	}
 	page_assign_page_cgroup(page, pc);
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-14  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-14  8:02 [RFC/PATCH 0/6] memcg: peformance improvement at el. v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14  8:04 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/6] memcg: drop_pages at force_empty KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14  8:07 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/6] memcg: remove refcnt KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-15  1:42   ` Li Zefan
2008-05-15  1:57     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-15  3:34       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14  8:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/6] memcg: handle swapcache KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14  8:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/6] memcg: shmem reclaim helper KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14  8:15   ` Li Zefan
2008-05-14  8:25     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14  8:23       ` Li Zefan
2008-05-14  8:32         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14  8:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/6] memcg: optimize branch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14  8:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080514171301.99e5d55e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox