From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m46I5TrG019238 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 14:05:29 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m46I5T44223496 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 14:05:29 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m46I5S2w003490 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 14:05:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 13:05:27 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Scaling msgmni to the amount of lowmem Message-ID: <20080506180527.GA8315@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20080211141646.948191000@bull.net> <20080211141813.354484000@bull.net> <12c511ca0804291328v2f0b87csd0f2cf3accc6ad00@mail.gmail.com> <481EC917.6070808@bull.net> <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843EC014392F9@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843EC014392F9@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Nadia Derbey , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-ID: Quoting Luck, Tony (tony.luck@intel.com): > > Well, this printk had been suggested by somebody (sorry I don't remember > > who) when I first submitted the patch. Actually I think it might be > > useful for a sysadmin to be aware of a change in the msgmni value: we > > have the message not only at boot time, but also each time msgmni is > > recomputed because of a change in the amount of memory. > > If the message is directed at the system administrator, then it would > be nice if there were some more meaningful way to show the namespace > that is affected than just printing the hex address of the kernel structure. > > As the sysadmin for my test systems, printing the hex address is mildly > annoying ... I now have to add a new case to my scripts that look at > dmesg output for unusual activity. > > Is there some better "name for a namespace" than the address? Perhaps > the process id of the process that instantiated the namespace??? I agree with Tony here. Aside from the nuisance it is to see that message on console every time I unshare a namespace, a printk doesn't seem like the right way to output the info. At most I'd say an audit message. -serge -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org