From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 15:43:39 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible. In-Reply-To: <481FFAAB.3030008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20080506151510.AC66.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <481FFAAB.3030008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20080506153943.AC69.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Lee Schermerhorn , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton List-ID: > > #ifdef CONFIG_MM_OWNER > > - struct task_struct *owner; /* The thread group leader that */ > > - /* owns the mm_struct. */ > > + struct task_struct *owner; /* point to one of task that owns the mm_struct. */ > > #endif > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > > How about just, the task that owns the mm_struct? One of, implies multiple owners. Ah, below is better? /* point to any one of task that related the mm_struct. */ my intention is only remove "thread group leader" word. other things, I obey your favor. Cheers! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org