From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 11:56:13 +0200 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] fix SMP data race in pagetable setup vs walking Message-ID: <20080506095613.GG10141@wotan.suse.de> References: <20080505112021.GC5018@wotan.suse.de> <20080505121240.GD5018@wotan.suse.de> <20080506.000803.80742226.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080506.000803.80742226.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Miller Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hugh@veritas.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com List-ID: On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:08:03AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Nick Piggin > Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:12:40 +0200 > > > I only converted x86 and powerpc. I think comments in x86 are good because > > that is more or less the reference implementation and is where many VM > > developers would look to understand mm/ code. Commenting all page table > > walking in all other architectures is kind of beyond my skill or patience, > > and maintainers might consider this weird "alpha thingy" is below them ;) > > But they are quite free to add smp_read_barrier_depends to their own code. > > > > Still would like more acks on this before it is applied. > > I've read this over a few times, I think it's OK: > > Acked-by: David S. Miller Thanks a lot for that (and the others who reviewed). Gives me more confidence. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org