From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:26:20 +0200 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: Warning on memory offline (and possible in usual migration?) Message-ID: <20080430072620.GI27652@wotan.suse.de> References: <20080414145806.c921c927.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080422045205.GH21993@wotan.suse.de> <20080422165608.7ab7026b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080422094352.GB23770@wotan.suse.de> <20080423004804.GA14134@wotan.suse.de> <20080429162016.961aa59d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080430065611.GH27652@wotan.suse.de> <20080430001249.c07ff5c8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080430001249.c07ff5c8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Christoph Lameter , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , GOTO List-ID: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:12:49AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:56:11 +0200 Nick Piggin wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:20:16PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > I myself want to this patch to be included (to next -mm) and put this under > > > test. How do you think ? Nick ? Christoph ? > > > > I think it should go upstream, yes. I imagine Andrew is probably just busy > > with merging at the moment. I guess we should resubmit if it isn't picked > > up in the next few days. > > Well I'm actually waiting for something which looks like a patch to fly > past. The last thing I saw was labelled "here is my proposed (uncompiled, > untested) fix". OK.. I don't have a good setup for testing page migration which is why I didn't test it. But it was since tested and found to solve the problem (or at least the warning went away). Christoph, do you have a regression test suite or something to run it through? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org