From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"xemul@openvz.org" <xemul@openvz.org>,
"hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>,
"yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/8] memcg: migration handling
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:22:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428202214.1172f4f2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080428201900.ae25e086.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
This patch changes migration path to assign page_cgroup of new page
at allocation.
Pros:
- We can avoid compliated lock depndencies.
Cons:
- new param to mem_cgroup_charge_common().
Changlog:
- adjusted to 2.6.25-mm1.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Index: mm-2.6.25-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mm-2.6.25-mm1.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mm-2.6.25-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(u
* < 0 if the cgroup is over its limit
*/
static int mem_cgroup_charge_common(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
- gfp_t gfp_mask, enum charge_type ctype)
+ gfp_t gfp_mask, enum charge_type ctype,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
struct mem_cgroup *mem;
struct page_cgroup *pc;
@@ -560,16 +561,21 @@ retry:
* thread group leader migrates. It's possible that mm is not
* set, if so charge the init_mm (happens for pagecache usage).
*/
- if (!mm)
- mm = &init_mm;
+ if (!memcg) {
+ if (!mm)
+ mm = &init_mm;
- rcu_read_lock();
- mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
- /*
- * For every charge from the cgroup, increment reference count
- */
- css_get(&mem->css);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
+ /*
+ * For every charge from the cgroup, increment reference count
+ */
+ css_get(&mem->css);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ } else {
+ mem = memcg;
+ css_get(&memcg->css);
+ }
while (res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE)) {
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
@@ -634,7 +640,7 @@ err:
int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
return mem_cgroup_charge_common(page, mm, gfp_mask,
- MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED);
+ MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED, NULL);
}
int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -643,7 +649,22 @@ int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page
if (!mm)
mm = &init_mm;
return mem_cgroup_charge_common(page, mm, gfp_mask,
- MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE);
+ MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE, NULL);
+}
+
+int mem_cgroup_getref(struct page *page)
+{
+ struct page_cgroup *pc;
+
+ if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+ return 0;
+
+ lock_page_cgroup(page);
+ pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
+ VM_BUG_ON(!pc);
+ pc->ref_cnt++;
+ unlock_page_cgroup(page);
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -693,65 +714,39 @@ unlock:
}
/*
- * Returns non-zero if a page (under migration) has valid page_cgroup member.
- * Refcnt of page_cgroup is incremented.
+ * Before starting migration, account against new page.
*/
-int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page)
+int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage)
{
struct page_cgroup *pc;
+ struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL;
+ enum charge_type ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED;
+ int ret = 0;
if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
return 0;
lock_page_cgroup(page);
pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
- if (pc)
- pc->ref_cnt++;
+ if (pc) {
+ mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
+ css_get(&mem->css);
+ if (pc->flags & PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_CACHE)
+ ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE;
+ }
unlock_page_cgroup(page);
- return pc != NULL;
-}
-
-void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page)
-{
- mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
+ if (mem) {
+ ret = mem_cgroup_charge_common(newpage, NULL, GFP_KERNEL,
+ ctype, mem);
+ css_put(&mem->css);
+ }
+ return ret;
}
-/*
- * We know both *page* and *newpage* are now not-on-LRU and PG_locked.
- * And no race with uncharge() routines because page_cgroup for *page*
- * has extra one reference by mem_cgroup_prepare_migration.
- */
-void mem_cgroup_page_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage)
+/* remove redundant charge */
+void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *newpage)
{
- struct page_cgroup *pc;
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- lock_page_cgroup(page);
- pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
- if (!pc) {
- unlock_page_cgroup(page);
- return;
- }
-
- mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
- __mem_cgroup_remove_list(mz, pc);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
-
- page_assign_page_cgroup(page, NULL);
- unlock_page_cgroup(page);
-
- pc->page = newpage;
- lock_page_cgroup(newpage);
- page_assign_page_cgroup(newpage, pc);
-
- mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
- __mem_cgroup_add_list(mz, pc);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
-
- unlock_page_cgroup(newpage);
+ mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(newpage);
}
/*
@@ -781,12 +776,19 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(
page = pc->page;
get_page(page);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
- mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
- put_page(page);
- if (--count <= 0) {
- count = FORCE_UNCHARGE_BATCH;
+ /*
+ * Check if this page is on LRU. !LRU page can be found
+ * if it's under page migration.
+ */
+ if (PageLRU(page)) {
+ mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
+ put_page(page);
+ if (--count <= 0) {
+ count = FORCE_UNCHARGE_BATCH;
+ cond_resched();
+ }
+ } else
cond_resched();
- }
spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
Index: mm-2.6.25-mm1/include/linux/memcontrol.h
===================================================================
--- mm-2.6.25-mm1.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ mm-2.6.25-mm1/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -50,9 +50,10 @@ extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_fro
#define mm_match_cgroup(mm, cgroup) \
((cgroup) == mem_cgroup_from_task((mm)->owner))
-extern int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page);
+extern int
+mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page);
-extern void mem_cgroup_page_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
+extern int mem_cgroup_getref(struct page *page);
/*
* For memory reclaim.
@@ -112,7 +113,8 @@ static inline int task_in_mem_cgroup(str
return 1;
}
-static inline int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page)
+static inline int
+mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -121,8 +123,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_end_migrat
{
}
-static inline void
-mem_cgroup_page_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage)
+static inline void mem_cgroup_getref(struct page *page)
{
}
Index: mm-2.6.25-mm1/mm/migrate.c
===================================================================
--- mm-2.6.25-mm1.orig/mm/migrate.c
+++ mm-2.6.25-mm1/mm/migrate.c
@@ -357,6 +357,10 @@ static int migrate_page_move_mapping(str
__inc_zone_page_state(newpage, NR_FILE_PAGES);
write_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ if (!PageSwapCache(newpage)) {
+ mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
+ mem_cgroup_getref(newpage);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -603,7 +607,6 @@ static int move_to_new_page(struct page
rc = fallback_migrate_page(mapping, newpage, page);
if (!rc) {
- mem_cgroup_page_migration(page, newpage);
remove_migration_ptes(page, newpage);
} else
newpage->mapping = NULL;
@@ -633,6 +636,12 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get
/* page was freed from under us. So we are done. */
goto move_newpage;
+ charge = mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(page, newpage);
+ if (charge == -ENOMEM) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto move_newpage;
+ }
+
rc = -EAGAIN;
if (TestSetPageLocked(page)) {
if (!force)
@@ -684,19 +693,14 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get
goto rcu_unlock;
}
- charge = mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(page);
/* Establish migration ptes or remove ptes */
try_to_unmap(page, 1);
if (!page_mapped(page))
rc = move_to_new_page(newpage, page);
- if (rc) {
+ if (rc)
remove_migration_ptes(page, page);
- if (charge)
- mem_cgroup_end_migration(page);
- } else if (charge)
- mem_cgroup_end_migration(newpage);
rcu_unlock:
if (rcu_locked)
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -717,6 +721,8 @@ unlock:
}
move_newpage:
+ if (!charge)
+ mem_cgroup_end_migration(newpage);
/*
* Move the new page to the LRU. If migration was not successful
* then this will free the page.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-28 11:19 [RFC][PATCH] memcg: performance improvement v2 [0/8] KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-28 11:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2008-04-29 1:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] memcg: migration handling Li Zefan
2008-04-29 1:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-28 11:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] memcg: remove refcnt KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-28 11:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] memcg: swapcache handling retry KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-28 11:26 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] memcg: read_mostly KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-29 1:34 ` Li Zefan
2008-04-29 1:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-28 11:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] memcg: optimize branches KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-29 2:04 ` Li Zefan
2008-04-29 2:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-29 3:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-28 11:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] memcg: remove redundant initilization KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-28 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] memcg: remove redundant checks KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-28 11:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] memcg: inlining mem_cgroup_chage_statistics() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080428202214.1172f4f2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox