From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
GOTO <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Warning on memory offline (and possible in usual migration?)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:41:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080423114107.b8df779c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080423004804.GA14134@wotan.suse.de>
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:48:04 +0200
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki found a warning message in the buffer dirtying code that
> is coming from page migration caller.
>
> WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:720 __set_page_dirty+0x330/0x360()
> Call Trace:
> [<a000000100015220>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0
> [<a000000100015270>] dump_stack+0x30/0x60
> [<a000000100089ed0>] warn_on_slowpath+0x90/0xe0
> [<a0000001001f8b10>] __set_page_dirty+0x330/0x360
> [<a0000001001ffb90>] __set_page_dirty_buffers+0xd0/0x280
> [<a00000010012fec0>] set_page_dirty+0xc0/0x260
> [<a000000100195670>] migrate_page_copy+0x5d0/0x5e0
> [<a000000100197840>] buffer_migrate_page+0x2e0/0x3c0
> [<a000000100195eb0>] migrate_pages+0x770/0xe00
>
> What was happening is that migrate_page_copy wants to transfer the PG_dirty
> bit from old page to new page, so what it would do is set_page_dirty(newpage).
> However set_page_dirty() is used to set the entire page dirty, wheras in
> this case, only part of the page was dirty, and it also was not uptodate.
>
> Marking the whole page dirty with set_page_dirty would lead to corruption or
> unresolvable conditions -- a dirty && !uptodate page and dirty && !uptodate
> buffers.
>
> Possibly we could just ClearPageDirty(oldpage); SetPageDirty(newpage);
> however in the interests of keeping the change minimal...
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Tested and seems to work well. thank you!
BTW, can I ask a question for understanding this change ?
==this check==
WARN_ON_ONCE(!PagePrivate(page) && !PageUptodate(page));
in __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() seems to check "the page should have buffer or
be up-to-date when it calls this function."
When it comes to __set_page_dirty() (in fs/buffer.c)
== this check==
WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && !PageUptodate(page));
is used and doesn't see page has buffers or not.
What's difference between two functions's condition for WARNING ?
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-14 5:58 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-14 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-15 10:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-15 19:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-16 0:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16 2:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16 3:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16 5:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16 18:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-16 11:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 0:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-17 6:38 ` Warning on memory offline (possible in migration ?) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-17 6:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 6:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-22 4:41 ` Warning on memory offline (and possible in usual migration?) Nick Piggin
2008-04-22 4:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-22 7:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-22 9:43 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-22 9:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-22 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-23 0:48 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-23 1:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-23 2:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2008-04-23 2:53 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-23 3:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-23 15:28 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-24 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-23 17:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-24 1:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-24 19:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-25 0:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-23 17:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-24 2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-29 7:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-30 6:56 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-30 7:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-30 7:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-30 7:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-30 7:26 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-30 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-30 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-01 1:44 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-01 19:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-02 0:44 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-02 1:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-02 1:23 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-02 1:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-02 21:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-05 4:27 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-05 17:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-06 8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-06 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-30 23:29 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-05-01 0:34 ` Badari Pulavarty
2008-05-01 8:36 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-04-22 4:50 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080423114107.b8df779c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox