linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	GOTO <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Warning on memory offline (and possible in usual migration?)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:41:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080423114107.b8df779c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080423004804.GA14134@wotan.suse.de>

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:48:04 +0200
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki found a warning message in the buffer dirtying code that
> is coming from page migration caller.
> 
> WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:720 __set_page_dirty+0x330/0x360()
> Call Trace:
>  [<a000000100015220>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0
>  [<a000000100015270>] dump_stack+0x30/0x60
>  [<a000000100089ed0>] warn_on_slowpath+0x90/0xe0
>  [<a0000001001f8b10>] __set_page_dirty+0x330/0x360
>  [<a0000001001ffb90>] __set_page_dirty_buffers+0xd0/0x280
>  [<a00000010012fec0>] set_page_dirty+0xc0/0x260
>  [<a000000100195670>] migrate_page_copy+0x5d0/0x5e0
>  [<a000000100197840>] buffer_migrate_page+0x2e0/0x3c0
>  [<a000000100195eb0>] migrate_pages+0x770/0xe00
> 
> What was happening is that migrate_page_copy wants to transfer the PG_dirty
> bit from old page to new page, so what it would do is set_page_dirty(newpage).
> However set_page_dirty() is used to set the entire page dirty, wheras in
> this case, only part of the page was dirty, and it also was not uptodate.
> 
> Marking the whole page dirty with set_page_dirty would lead to corruption or
> unresolvable conditions -- a dirty && !uptodate page and dirty && !uptodate
> buffers.
> 
> Possibly we could just ClearPageDirty(oldpage); SetPageDirty(newpage);
> however in the interests of keeping the change minimal...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

Tested and seems to work well. thank you!

BTW, can I ask a question for understanding this change ?

==this check==
 WARN_ON_ONCE(!PagePrivate(page) && !PageUptodate(page));

in __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() seems to check "the page should have buffer or
be up-to-date when it calls this function."

When it comes to __set_page_dirty() (in fs/buffer.c)
== this check==
 WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && !PageUptodate(page));

is used and doesn't see page has buffers or not.
What's difference between two functions's condition for WARNING ?

-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-23  2:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-14  5:58 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-14 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-15 10:13   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-15 19:31     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-16  0:23       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16  2:23         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16  3:10           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16  5:22             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16 18:04             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-16 11:00   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-16 18:36     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17  0:19       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-17  6:38         ` Warning on memory offline (possible in migration ?) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-17  6:43           ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17  6:55             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-22  4:41       ` Warning on memory offline (and possible in usual migration?) Nick Piggin
2008-04-22  4:52   ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-22  7:56     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-22  9:43       ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-22  9:57         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-22 19:16         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-23  0:48           ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-23  1:37             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-23  2:41             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2008-04-23  2:53               ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-23  3:44                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-23 15:28                   ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-24  1:34                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-23 17:50                   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-24  1:36                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-24 19:11                       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-25  0:11                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-23 17:47                 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-24  2:13                   ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-29  7:20             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-30  6:56               ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-30  7:04                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-30  7:12                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-30  7:22                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-30  7:26                   ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-30 17:59                     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-30 18:01                     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-01  1:44                       ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-01 19:25                         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-02  0:44                           ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-02  1:07                             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-02  1:23                               ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-02  1:37                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-02 21:16                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-05  4:27                                     ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-05 17:28                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-06  8:52                                         ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-06 17:49                                           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-30 23:29                     ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-05-01  0:34                       ` Badari Pulavarty
2008-05-01  8:36                       ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-04-22  4:50 ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080423114107.b8df779c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox