From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <20080423015302.745723000@nick.local0.net> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:53:02 +1000 From: npiggin@suse.de Subject: [patch 00/18] multi size, and giant hugetlb page support, 1GB hugetlb for x86 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, andi@firstfloor.org, kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nacc@us.ibm.com, abh@cray.com, wli@holomorphy.com List-ID: Hi Patches 1 and 2 are good to merge upstream now. Patch 3 I hope gets merged too. After Andrew's big upstream merge, and this round of review, I plan push the reset of the patchset into -mm. It would be very nice to have the powerpc patches integrated and tested by that point too -- is there something I can pick up? I'm again not sure of the sysfs work. I think this patchset probably actually does make sense to go in first, because it will necessarily change the layout of the sysfs directories. I have integrated bounds fixes, and type size fixes suggested by reviewers. Merged those and my previous round of fixes into the previous patches in the patchset. Have done a little bit more juggling of the patchset (without changing the end result but trying to improve the steps). Then I have done another set of fixes in the last patch of the patchset, which will again be merged after review. Testing-wise, I've changed the registration mechanism so that if you specify hugepagesz=1G on the command line, then you do not get the 2M pages by default (you have to also specify hugepagesz=2M). Also, when only one hstate is registered, all the proc outputs appear unchanged, so this makes it very easy to test with. Thanks, Nick -- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org