From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:55:53 -0400 References: <20080417160331.b4729f0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200804171955.46600.paul.moore@hp.com> <20080417170407.1e68dfc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080417170407.1e68dfc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804181055.53281.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov List-ID: On Thursday 17 April 2008 8:04:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:46 -0400 > > Paul Moore wrote: > > For what it's worth I just looked over the changes in netnode.c and > > nothing is jumping out at me. The changes ran fine for me when > > tested on the later 2.6.25-rcX kernels but I suppose that doesn't > > mean a whole lot. > > Perhaps it was tested only against slub? That config uses slab. Yes, I believe it was testing it with slub. -- paul moore linux @ hp -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org