From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:02:13 -0500 From: Robin Holt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 9] Lock the entire mm to prevent any mmu related operation to happen Message-ID: <20080416190213.GK22493@sgi.com> References: <20080416163337.GJ22493@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Robin Holt , Andrea Arcangeli , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Nick Piggin , Steve Wise , Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins List-ID: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:35:38AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Robin Holt wrote: > > > I don't think this lock mechanism is completely working. I have > > gotten a few failures trying to dereference 0x100100 which appears to > > be LIST_POISON1. > > How does xpmem unregistering of notifiers work? For the tests I have been running, we are waiting for the release callout as part of exit. Thanks, Robin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org