linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Make the memory controller more desktop responsive
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:55:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080403185555.9dfe8dd3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F4A700.3080307@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:14:32 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:02:53 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> This patch makes the memory controller more responsive on my desktop.
> >>
> >> Here is what the patch does
> >>
> >> 1. Reduces the number of retries to 2. We had 5 earlier, since we
> >>    were controlling swap cache as well. We pushed data from mappings
> >>    to swap cache and we needed additional passes to clear out the cache.
> > 
> > Hmm, what this change improves ?
> > I don't want to see OOM.
> > 
> 
> I had set it to 5 earlier, since the swap cache came back to our memory
> controller, where it was accounted. I have not seen OOM with it on my desktop,
> but at some point if the memory required is so much that we cannot fulfill it,
> we do OOM. I have not seen any OOM so far with these changes.
> 
Hmm, I'm now testing swap-cache accounting patch.
It seems I should check this value again.

Thanks,
-Kame

      reply	other threads:[~2008-04-03  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-03  9:32 Balbir Singh
2008-04-03  9:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-03  9:44   ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-03  9:55     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080403185555.9dfe8dd3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox