From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] SLQB: YASA
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:33:12 +0900
Message-ID: <20080403173110.0286.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
References: <20080403171626.0283.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080403082650.GA20132@wotan.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1762031AbYDCIde@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080403082650.GA20132@wotan.suse.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
List-Id: linux-mm.kvack.org

Hi

> > Do you have performance mesurement result?
> > I hope see it if possible.
> > 
> > Thanks! :)
> 
> Nothing really interesting, unfortunately. I have run some tests on
> various microbenchmarks like tbench and things like that. But I
> don't have many good ideas for more meaningful tests where slab
> allocation performance is critial. Any suggestions? :)

nothing.
sorry, i am not slab expert ;)