From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC][-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v4) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:53:57 +0900 Message-ID: <20080402135357.04c3e79f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080401124312.23664.64616.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20080402093157.e445acfb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <47F2FCAE.7070401@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47F2FCAE.7070401@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Paul Menage , Pavel Emelianov , Hugh Dickins , Sudhir Kumar , YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-mm.kvack.org On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:55:34 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > > > >> + /* > >> + * Search through everything else. We should not get > >> + * here often > >> + */ > >> + do_each_thread(g, c) { > >> + if (c->mm == mm) > >> + goto assign_new_owner; > >> + } while_each_thread(g, c); > > > > Doing above in synchronized manner seems too heavy. > > When this happen ? or Can this be done in lazy "on-demand" manner ? > > > > Do you mean under task_lock()? > No, scanning itself. How rarely this scan happens under a server which has 10000- threads ? Thanks, -Kame