From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:08:20 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64: Add UV specific header for MMR definitions Message-ID: <20080326000820.GA18701@infradead.org> References: <20080324182116.GA28285@sgi.com> <20080325082756.GA6589@infradead.org> <87myoni0gp.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87myoni0gp.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andi Kleen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jack Steiner , mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > bitfields are only problematic on portable code, which this isn't. it's still crappy to read and a bad example for others. And last time I heard about UV it also included an ia64 version, but that's been loooong ago. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org