From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:31:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080321.003123.180348056.davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [14/14] vcompound: Avoid vmalloc for ehash_locks From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20080321061727.491610308@sgi.com> <47E35D73.6060703@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org From: Christoph Lameter Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: To: clameter@sgi.com Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > But, isnt it defeating the purpose of this *particular* vmalloc() use ? > > I thought that was controlled by hashdist? I did not see it used here and > so I assumed that the RR was not intended here. It's intended for all of the major networking hash tables. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org