From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] another swap controller for cgroup In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:15:16 +0900" <47DE2894.6010306@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> References: <47DE2894.6010306@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20080317085003.EA4511E7A77@siro.lan> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:50:03 +0900 (JST) From: yamamoto@valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp Cc: minoura@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, hugh@veritas.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-ID: > > - anonymous objects (shmem) are not accounted. > IMHO, shmem should be accounted. > I agree it's difficult in your implementation, > but are you going to support it? it should be trivial to track how much swap an anonymous object is using. i'm not sure how it should be associated with cgroups, tho. YAMAMOTO Takashi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org