* Re: what to patch
[not found] ` <20080310120902.5f25b9f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
@ 2008-03-10 19:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-03-10 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2008-03-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-mm
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:09:02 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> I get a significant-looking reject from this. Can you please redo and
> resend?
>
>
> I put my current rollup (against -rc5) at
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dr.gz and the broken-out tree is, as always
> at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>
> It would be better for you to get set up for using mmotm - it is my usual
> way of publishing the -mm queue between releases.
Speaking of what to patch, I'm looking at making a big set of
kernel-docbook changes/fixes/additions to the mm/ subdir.
Should I make patches to mainline or -mm (or mmotm) or what?
mm/ seems to have a *lot* of patches. ;)
Thanks,
---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: what to patch
2008-03-10 19:20 ` what to patch Randy Dunlap
@ 2008-03-10 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-03-10 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: linux-mm
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:20:10 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:09:02 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > I get a significant-looking reject from this. Can you please redo and
> > resend?
> >
> >
> > I put my current rollup (against -rc5) at
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dr.gz and the broken-out tree is, as always
> > at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> >
> > It would be better for you to get set up for using mmotm - it is my usual
> > way of publishing the -mm queue between releases.
>
> Speaking of what to patch, I'm looking at making a big set of
> kernel-docbook changes/fixes/additions to the mm/ subdir.
> Should I make patches to mainline or -mm (or mmotm) or what?
mmotm would be best please.
> mm/ seems to have a *lot* of patches. ;)
Actually the number of memory-management patches in -mm is much less this
time than it usually is. Perhaps we finished it.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-10 19:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <alpine.DEB.1.00.0803071720460.4611@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
[not found] ` <20080310120902.5f25b9f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-03-10 19:20 ` what to patch Randy Dunlap
2008-03-10 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox