From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:55:59 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: what to patch Message-Id: <20080310125559.796bdaaf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080310122010.a2170c9c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20080310120902.5f25b9f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080310122010.a2170c9c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:20:10 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:09:02 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I get a significant-looking reject from this. Can you please redo and > > resend? > > > > > > I put my current rollup (against -rc5) at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dr.gz and the broken-out tree is, as always > > at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ > > > > It would be better for you to get set up for using mmotm - it is my usual > > way of publishing the -mm queue between releases. > > Speaking of what to patch, I'm looking at making a big set of > kernel-docbook changes/fixes/additions to the mm/ subdir. > Should I make patches to mainline or -mm (or mmotm) or what? mmotm would be best please. > mm/ seems to have a *lot* of patches. ;) Actually the number of memory-management patches in -mm is much less this time than it usually is. Perhaps we finished it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org