From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:20:10 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: what to patch Message-Id: <20080310122010.a2170c9c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20080310120902.5f25b9f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080310120902.5f25b9f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:09:02 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > I get a significant-looking reject from this. Can you please redo and > resend? > > > I put my current rollup (against -rc5) at > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dr.gz and the broken-out tree is, as always > at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ > > It would be better for you to get set up for using mmotm - it is my usual > way of publishing the -mm queue between releases. Speaking of what to patch, I'm looking at making a big set of kernel-docbook changes/fixes/additions to the mm/ subdir. Should I make patches to mainline or -mm (or mmotm) or what? mm/ seems to have a *lot* of patches. ;) Thanks, --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org