From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:42:20 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure In-Reply-To: <1204643158.5338.5.camel@localhost> References: <20080304192441.1EA2.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1204643158.5338.5.camel@localhost> Message-Id: <20080305103545.1EAE.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > > > +config NORECLAIM > > > + bool "Track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)" > > > + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && 64BIT > > > > as far as I remembered, somebody said CONFIG_NORECLAIM is easy confusable. > > may be.. > > > > IMHO insert "lru" word is better. > > example, > > > > config NORECLAIM_LRU > > bool "Zone LRU of track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)" > > depends on EXPERIMENTAL && 64BIT > > OK. But, I'd suggest the 'bool' description be something like: > > config NORECLAIM_LRU > bool "Add LRU list to track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)" That's nice. thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org