From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, clameter@sgi.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
rientjes@google.com, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r3
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:12:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080229141250.GA6045@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080227214708.6858.53458.sendpatchset@localhost>
On (27/02/08 16:47), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce:
> From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r3
>
> This is a rebase of the two-zonelist patchset to 2.6.25-rc2-mm1.
>
> Mel, still on vacation last I checked, asked me to repost these
> as I'd already rebased them and I've been testing them continually
> on each -mm tree for months, hoping to see them in -mm for wider
> testing.
>
Thanks a lot, Lee. I tested this patchset against a slightly patched
2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (compile-failure fix and a memoryless-related bug that is
fixed in git-x86#testing).
> These are the range of performance losses/gains when running against
> 2.6.24-rc4-mm1. The set and these machines are a mix of i386, x86_64 and
> ppc64 both NUMA and non-NUMA.
>
Against 2.6.25-rc5-mm1, the results are
loss to gain
Total CPU time on Kernbench: -0.23% 1.04%
Elapsed time on Kernbench: -0.69% 3.86%
page_test from aim9: -3.74% 5.72%
brk_test from aim9: -7.37% 10.98%
fork_test from aim9: -3.52% 3.17%
exec_test from aim9: -2.78% 2.34%
TBench: -1.93% 2.96%
Hackbench was similarly variable but most machines showed little or no
difference. As before, whether the changes are a performance win/loss
depends on the machine but the majority of results showed little
difference.
> loss to gain
> Total CPU time on Kernbench: -0.86% to 1.13%
> Elapsed time on Kernbench: -0.79% to 0.76%
> page_test from aim9: -4.37% to 0.79%
> brk_test from aim9: -0.71% to 4.07%
> fork_test from aim9: -1.84% to 4.60%
> exec_test from aim9: -0.71% to 1.08%
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-27 21:47 Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] Use zonelists instead of zones when direct reclaiming pages Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] Introduce node_zonelist() for accessing the zonelist for a GFP mask Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] Remember what the preferred zone is for zone_statistics Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 22:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 17:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 14:19 ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-29 2:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-02-29 14:32 ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] Use two zonelist that are filtered by GFP mask Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-28 21:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-28 21:53 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 2:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-02-29 14:50 ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-29 15:48 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 21:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-04 18:01 ` Mel Gorman
2008-03-05 16:06 ` [PATCH] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - Mempolicy: make dequeue_huge_page_vma() obey MPOL_BIND nodemask Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-05 18:03 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-05 19:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 1:04 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-06 15:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 21:24 ` [PATCH] Mempolicy: make dequeue_huge_page_vma() obey MPOL_BIND nodemask rework Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-07 17:35 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-07 18:31 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-08 0:27 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-06 0:39 ` [PATCH] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - Mempolicy: make dequeue_huge_page_vma() obey MPOL_BIND nodemask Andrew Morton
2008-03-06 15:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] Use two zonelist that are filtered by GFP mask Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] Have zonelist contains structs with both a zone pointer and zone_idx Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-29 7:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-29 2:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-07 11:56 ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-29 8:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-27 21:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r3 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 14:12 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080229141250.GA6045@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox