Re: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2

[KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Hi

> Things are changing, with memory hot-add remove, CPU hotplug , the topology can
> change and is no longer static. One can create fake NUMA nodes on the fly using
> a boot option as well.

agreed.

> Since we're talking of parallel reclaims, I think it's a function of CPUs and
> Nodes. I'd rather keep it as a sysctl with a good default value based on the
> topology. If we end up getting it wrong, the system administrator has a choice.
> That is better than expecting him/her to recompile the kernel and boot that. A
> sysctl does not create problems either w.r.t changing the number of threads, no
> hard to solve race-conditions - it is fairly straight forward

sorry, I don't understand yet.
I think my patch is already function of CPUs and Nodes.
per zone limit indicate propotional #cpus and #nodes.

please tell me the topology that per zone limit doesn't works so good.

I think boot option and sysctl should be used only while -mm
for get various feedback.
end up, we should select more better default, and remove sysctl.


- kosaki


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>