From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:33:57 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2 In-Reply-To: References: <47C4EF2D.90508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20080227143301.4252.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Rientjes Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Balbir Singh , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel , Lee Schermerhorn , Nick Piggin List-ID: Hi David, > I disagree, the config option is indeed static but so is the NUMA topology > of the machine. It represents the maximum number of page reclaim threads > that should be allowed for that specific topology; a maximum should not > need to be redefined with yet another sysctl and should remain independent > of various workloads. ok. > However, I would recommend adding the word "MAX" to the config option. MAX_PARALLEL_RECLAIM_TASK is good word? - kosaki -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org