From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:30:55 -0500 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2 Message-ID: <20080227103055.2267b50c@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: References: <47C4F9C0.5010607@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080227160746.425E.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Rientjes Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Balbir Singh , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Lee Schermerhorn , Nick Piggin List-ID: On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:19:08 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes wrote: > My suggestion is merely to make the number of concurrent page reclaim > threads be a function of how many online cpus there are. The more CPUs there are, the more lock contention you want? Somehow that seems backwards :) -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org