From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:34:43 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] memcg: remove mem_cgroup_uncharge Message-Id: <20080226103443.f0c022c2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Balbir Singh , Andrew Morton , Hirokazu Takahashi , YAMAMOTO Takashi , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:42:05 +0000 (GMT) Hugh Dickins wrote: > Nothing uses mem_cgroup_uncharge apart from mem_cgroup_uncharge_page, > (a trivial wrapper around it) and mem_cgroup_end_migration (which does > the same as mem_cgroup_uncharge_page). And it often ends up having to > lock just to let its caller unlock. Remove it (but leave the silly > locking until a later patch). > > Moved mem_cgroup_cache_charge next to mem_cgroup_charge in memcontrol.h. > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins Hmm, ok. Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org