From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:09:58 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document huge memory/cache overhead of memory controller in Kconfig In-Reply-To: <20080221235527.GD25977@elf.ucw.cz> References: <2f11576a0802210646u77409690me940717fac746315@mail.gmail.com> <20080221235527.GD25977@elf.ucw.cz> Message-Id: <20080222120758.AE67.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Pavel Machek Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Jan Engelhardt , Balbir Singh , John Stoffel , Andi Kleen , akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Hi > > I think one reason of many people easy confusion is caused by bad menu > > hierarchy. > > I popose mem-cgroup move to child of cgroup and resource counter > > (= obey denend on). > > > +config CGROUP_MEM_CONT > > + bool "Memory controller for cgroups" > > Memory _resource_ controller for cgroups? Ahhh my proposal only change menu hierarchy. I don't know best name and i hope avoid rename discussion ;-) Thanks. - kosaki -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org