From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m18H864W022099 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:08:06 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m18H863K130026 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:08:06 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m18H85ho002155 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:08:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:08:05 -0800 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hugetlb: numafy several functions Message-ID: <20080208170805.GD15903@us.ibm.com> References: <20080206231558.GI3477@us.ibm.com> <1202409315.5298.65.camel@localhost> <20080207185205.GD18302@us.ibm.com> <1202489237.5346.26.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1202489237.5346.26.camel@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, agl@us.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton List-ID: On 08.02.2008 [11:47:17 -0500], Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 10:52 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 07.02.2008 [13:35:15 -0500], Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 15:15 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > hugetlb: numafy several functions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nish: glad to see these surface again. I'll add them [back] into my > > > tree for testing. I'm at 24-mm1. Can't tell from the messages what > > > release they're against, but I'll sort that out. > > > > They were against -git tip when I rebased ... hrm that would be > > 551e4fb2465b87de9d4aa1669b27d624435443bb, I believe. > > > > > Another thing: I've tended to test these atop Mel Gorman's zonelist > > > rework and a set of mempolicy cleanups that I'm holding pending > > > acceptance of Mel's patches. I'll probably do that with these. At > > > some point we need to sort out with Andrew when or whether Mel's > > > patches will hit -mm. If so, what order vs yours... > > > > I think Mel's patches may be more generally useful than mine (as mine > > are all keyed on hugepage support). So I would like to see his go first > > then I can rework mine on top, if that is the order that it ends up > > happening in. > > Nish: > > Heads up: Your "smarter retry" patch will need some rework in vmscan.c > because of the memory controller changes [currently in 24-mm1]. I have > rebased you patches against 24-mm1, atop Mel's two-zonelist patches and > my mempolicy cleanup series. I can send you the entire stack or place > the tarball on a web site, if you're interested. I can refresh the patchset for -mm, I was just posting based upon mainline as that was traditionally how I sent patches to Andrew. But in this case you're right, there are enough collisions with existing -mm bits that I should rebase. Thanks for the heads up. -Nish -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org