From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:50:13 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git Message-ID: <20080131085013.GB1585@elte.hu> References: <20080130180940.022172000@sgi.com> <20080130180940.921597000@sgi.com> <20080130215339.GC28242@elte.hu> <1201768346.18221.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1201768346.18221.5.camel@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: travis@sgi.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: * Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * travis@sgi.com wrote: > > > > > Change s390 percpu.h to use asm-generic/percpu.h > > > > do the s390 maintainer agree with this change (Acks please), and has it > > been tested on s390? > > Now I'm confused. The patch has been acked a few weeks ago and the > last 5+ version of the patch had the acked line. The lastest version > dropped it for a reason I don't know. And more, the patch is already > upstream with the (correct) acked line, see git commit > f034347470e486835ccdcd7a5bb2ceb417be11c4. So, what is the problem ? the latest patch was sent without your acked line and i asked about that. But later on Mike told me that you acked it - so i restored the ack and the patch, Linus pulled the fixes and it now all is upstream and all architectures should be fine again now. Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org