From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:27:59 +0100 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix boot problem in situations where the boot CPU is running on a memoryless node Message-ID: <20080123142759.GB19161@aepfle.de> References: <20080118225713.GA31128@aepfle.de> <20080122195448.GA15567@csn.ul.ie> <20080122214505.GA15674@aepfle.de> <20080123075821.GA17713@aepfle.de> <20080123105044.GD21455@csn.ul.ie> <20080123121459.GA18631@aepfle.de> <20080123125236.GA18876@aepfle.de> <20080123135513.GA14175@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080123135513.GA14175@csn.ul.ie> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, Linux MM , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , hanth Aravamudan , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote: > This patch in combination with a partial revert of commit > 04231b3002ac53f8a64a7bd142fde3fa4b6808c6 fixes a regression between 2.6.23 > and 2.6.24-rc8 where a PPC64 machine with all CPUS on a memoryless node fails > to boot. If approved by the SLAB maintainers, it should be merged for 2.6.24. This change alone does not help, its not the version I tested. Will all the changes below go into 2.6.24 as well, in a seperate patch? - for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) { + for_each_online_node(node) { -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org