From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:23:01 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [BUG] at mm/slab.c:3320 Message-Id: <20080107102301.db52ab64.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20080103155046.GA7092@skywalker> References: <20071220100541.GA6953@skywalker> <20071225140519.ef8457ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071227153235.GA6443@skywalker> <20071228051959.GA6385@skywalker> <20080103155046.GA7092@skywalker> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, nacc@us.ibm.com, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, bob.picco@hp.com, mel@skynet.ie List-ID: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:20:46 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote: > Node: 0, start_pfn: 0, end_pfn: 156 > Node: 0, start_pfn: 256, end_pfn: 917393 > Node: 0, start_pfn: 1048576, end_pfn: 2752512 > get_memcfg_from_srat: assigning address to rsdp > RSD PTR v0 [IBM ] > Begin SRAT table scan.... > CPU 0x00 in proximity domain 0x00 > CPU 0x02 in proximity domain 0x00 > CPU 0x10 in proximity domain 0x00 > CPU 0x12 in proximity domain 0x00 > Memory range 0x0 to 0xE0000 (type 0x0) in proximity domain 0x00 enabled > Memory range 0x100000 to 0x120000 (type 0x0) in proximity domain 0x00 enabled > CPU 0x20 in proximity domain 0x01 > CPU 0x22 in proximity domain 0x01 > CPU 0x30 in proximity domain 0x01 > CPU 0x32 in proximity domain 0x01 > Memory range 0x120000 to 0x2A0000 (type 0x0) in proximity domain 0x01 enabled > acpi20_parse_srat: Entry length value is zero; can't parse any further! > pxm bitmap: 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Number of logical nodes in system = 2 > Number of memory chunks in system = 3 > chunk 0 nid 0 start_pfn 00000000 end_pfn 000e0000 > chunk 1 nid 0 start_pfn 00100000 end_pfn 00120000 > chunk 2 nid 1 start_pfn 00120000 end_pfn 002a0000 > Node: 0, start_pfn: 0, end_pfn: 1179648 > Node: 1, start_pfn: 1179648, end_pfn: 2752512 Seems Node 1 has no NORMAL memory. Because the patch changes 'online_node' to N_NORMAL_MEMORY, there is a change. I'm not sure but cachep->nodelists[] should be created against all online nodes ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org