From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:39:52 -0500 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory Message-ID: <20080105173952.0b8db5f3@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <6101e8c40801040821i495747f2ref1a0df711c23ea@mail.gmail.com> References: <6101e8c40801040739i4d7f6e58rbd9b6d68e4565bc7@mail.gmail.com> <6101e8c40801040821i495747f2ref1a0df711c23ea@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Oliver Pinter (=?UTF-8?B?UGludMOpciBPbGl2w6ly?=)" Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:21:39 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (PintA(C)r OlivA(C)r)" wrote: > Maximum RAM: > * 2 TB on current hardware -> solaris10 > * 256 GB on X64 -> RHEL5 The amount listed for RHEL is not the theoretical maximum, but the largest amount that has actually been tested. The limits are different per architecture. > from http://blogs.sun.com/BVass/resource/SolarisRHELNEWcomparison.pdf > > the questions is: > > this informations is correct or not? You'll also want to ask yourself the question: "Is this information complete?" It's not hard to come up with a few checklist items where RHEL looks better than Solaris, but they don't seem to be in this particular PDF :) -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org