linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory
       [not found] <6101e8c40801040739i4d7f6e58rbd9b6d68e4565bc7@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-01-04 16:21 ` Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
  2008-01-05 22:39   ` Rik van Riel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) @ 2008-01-04 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm

Hi All!


Maximum RAM:
* 2 TB on current hardware  -> solaris10
* 256 GB on X64 -> RHEL5

from http://blogs.sun.com/BVass/resource/SolarisRHELNEWcomparison.pdf

the questions is:

this informations is correct or not?


-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory
  2008-01-04 16:21 ` Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
@ 2008-01-05 22:39   ` Rik van Riel
  2008-01-08  6:03     ` Christoph Lameter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2008-01-05 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér); +Cc: linux-mm

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:21:39 +0100
"Oliver Pinter (PintA(C)r OlivA(C)r)"  <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maximum RAM:
> * 2 TB on current hardware  -> solaris10
> * 256 GB on X64 -> RHEL5

The amount listed for RHEL is not the theoretical maximum, but
the largest amount that has actually been tested. The limits are 
different per architecture.
 
> from http://blogs.sun.com/BVass/resource/SolarisRHELNEWcomparison.pdf
> 
> the questions is:
> 
> this informations is correct or not?

You'll also want to ask yourself the question:

	"Is this information complete?"

It's not hard to come up with a few checklist items where
RHEL looks better than Solaris, but they don't seem to be
in this particular PDF :)

-- 
All rights reversed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory
  2008-01-05 22:39   ` Rik van Riel
@ 2008-01-08  6:03     ` Christoph Lameter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-01-08  6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér), linux-mm

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > Maximum RAM:
> > * 2 TB on current hardware  -> solaris10
> > * 256 GB on X64 -> RHEL5
> 
> The amount listed for RHEL is not the theoretical maximum, but
> the largest amount that has actually been tested. The limits are 
> different per architecture.

We just deployed a Linux system at NASA with 4TB RAM and 4096 cores (IA64).
 
http://www.nas.nasa.gov/

But there are systems with more memory out there like the one in Munich 
with 16TB:

http://192.48.170.160/pdfs/4007.pdf

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-08  6:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <6101e8c40801040739i4d7f6e58rbd9b6d68e4565bc7@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-04 16:21 ` Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
2008-01-05 22:39   ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08  6:03     ` Christoph Lameter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox