* Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory
[not found] <6101e8c40801040739i4d7f6e58rbd9b6d68e4565bc7@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-01-04 16:21 ` Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
2008-01-05 22:39 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) @ 2008-01-04 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Hi All!
Maximum RAM:
* 2 TB on current hardware -> solaris10
* 256 GB on X64 -> RHEL5
from http://blogs.sun.com/BVass/resource/SolarisRHELNEWcomparison.pdf
the questions is:
this informations is correct or not?
--
Thanks,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory
2008-01-04 16:21 ` Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
@ 2008-01-05 22:39 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 6:03 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2008-01-05 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér); +Cc: linux-mm
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:21:39 +0100
"Oliver Pinter (PintA(C)r OlivA(C)r)" <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maximum RAM:
> * 2 TB on current hardware -> solaris10
> * 256 GB on X64 -> RHEL5
The amount listed for RHEL is not the theoretical maximum, but
the largest amount that has actually been tested. The limits are
different per architecture.
> from http://blogs.sun.com/BVass/resource/SolarisRHELNEWcomparison.pdf
>
> the questions is:
>
> this informations is correct or not?
You'll also want to ask yourself the question:
"Is this information complete?"
It's not hard to come up with a few checklist items where
RHEL looks better than Solaris, but they don't seem to be
in this particular PDF :)
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory
2008-01-05 22:39 ` Rik van Riel
@ 2008-01-08 6:03 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-01-08 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér), linux-mm
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Maximum RAM:
> > * 2 TB on current hardware -> solaris10
> > * 256 GB on X64 -> RHEL5
>
> The amount listed for RHEL is not the theoretical maximum, but
> the largest amount that has actually been tested. The limits are
> different per architecture.
We just deployed a Linux system at NASA with 4TB RAM and 4096 cores (IA64).
http://www.nas.nasa.gov/
But there are systems with more memory out there like the one in Munich
with 16TB:
http://192.48.170.160/pdfs/4007.pdf
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-08 6:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <6101e8c40801040739i4d7f6e58rbd9b6d68e4565bc7@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-04 16:21 ` Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
2008-01-05 22:39 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 6:03 ` Christoph Lameter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox