From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:18:56 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [7/8] bacground reclaim for memory controller Message-Id: <20071204121856.910afa40.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20071204030756.25A971D0B8F@siro.lan> References: <20071203184244.200faee8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20071204030756.25A971D0B8F@siro.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: YAMAMOTO Takashi Cc: riel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, xemul@openvz.org, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-ID: On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:07:55 +0900 (JST) yamamoto@valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: > you don't need the kthread as far as RES_HWMARK is "infinite". > given the current default value of RES_HWMARK, you can simplify > initialization by deferring the kthread creation to mem_cgroup_write. > Hmm, will try. But I wonder whether assumption can be true forever or not. For example, when memory controller supports sub-group and a relationship between a parent group and children groups are established. But, think it later is an one way ;) I'll try to make things simpler. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org