linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yamamoto@valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: riel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, xemul@openvz.org,
	balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [7/8] bacground reclaim for memory controller
Date: Tue,  4 Dec 2007 12:31:18 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071204033118.2BA4C1D0B99@siro.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:18:56 +0900" <20071204121856.910afa40.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

> On Tue,  4 Dec 2007 12:07:55 +0900 (JST)
> yamamoto@valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > you don't need the kthread as far as RES_HWMARK is "infinite".
> > given the current default value of RES_HWMARK, you can simplify
> > initialization by deferring the kthread creation to mem_cgroup_write.
> > 
> Hmm, will try. But I wonder whether assumption can be true forever or not.
> For example, when memory controller supports sub-group and a relationship
> between a parent group and children groups are established.
> 
> But, think it later is an one way ;) I'll try to make things simpler.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Kame

the point is to create a thread when setting RES_HWMARK.
mem_cgroup_write is merely an example.  it can be when inheriting
watermarks from the parent cgroup, etc.
anyway, the assumption we need here is that the default value of
the top level cgroup's high watermark is infinite.  i think it's
a quite reasonable assumption.

YAMAMOTO Takashi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-04  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-03  9:33 [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [0/8] introduction KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-03  9:35 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [1/8] clean up : remove unused variable KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04 15:55   ` Balbir Singh
2007-12-03  9:36 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [2/8] add BUG_ON() in mem_cgroup_zoneinfo KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04 16:01   ` Balbir Singh
2007-12-03  9:37 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [3/8] define free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04 16:32   ` Balbir Singh
2007-12-03  9:38 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [4/8] possible race fix in res_counter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04 19:02   ` Balbir Singh
2007-12-03  9:39 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [5/8] throttling simultaneous callers of try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-03 14:24   ` Rik van Riel
2007-12-04  1:33     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04 13:27       ` Balbir Singh
2007-12-05  0:26         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-03  9:41 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [6/8] high_low watermark for res_counter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-03  9:42 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [7/8] bacground reclaim for memory controller KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04  3:07   ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2007-12-04  3:18     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04  3:31       ` YAMAMOTO Takashi [this message]
2007-12-03  9:45 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [8/8] wake up waiters at unchage KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04  6:46 ` [RFC][for -mm] memory controller enhancements for reclaiming take2 [0/8] introduction KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-04 14:25 ` Balbir Singh
2007-12-05  0:44   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071204033118.2BA4C1D0B99@siro.lan \
    --to=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox