From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:42:07 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter Message-Id: <20071129124207.b59ae745.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20071129033328.20E5F1CFEAA@siro.lan> References: <20071127120048.ef5f2005.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20071129033328.20E5F1CFEAA@siro.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: YAMAMOTO Takashi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-ID: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:33:28 +0900 (JST) yamamoto@valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: > > +static inline struct mem_cgroup_per_zone * > > +mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid, int zid) > > +{ > > + if (!mem->info.nodeinfo[nid]) > > can this be true? > > YAMAMOTO Takashi When I set early_init=1, I added that check. BUG_ON() is better ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org