From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"containers@lists.osdl.org" <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
"kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [0/10] introduction
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:55:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071127115525.e9779108.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
Hi, this is per-zone/reclaim support patch set for memory controller (cgroup).
Major changes from previous one is
-- tested with 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 + ia64/NUMA
-- applied comments.
I did small test on real NUMA machine.
My machine was ia64/8CPU/2Node NUMA. I tried to complile the kernel under 800M
bytes limit with 32 parallel make. (make -j 32)
- 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 (+ scsi fix) .... shows soft lock-up.
before soft lock-up, %sys was almost 100% in several times.
- 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 (+ scsi fix) + this set .... completed succesfully
It seems %iowait dominates the total performance.
(current memory controller has no background reclaim)
Seems this set give us some progress.
(*) I'd like to merge YAMAMOTO-san's background page reclaim for memory
controller before discussing about the number of performance.
Andrew, could you pick these up to -mm ?
Patch series brief description:
[1/10] ... add scan_global_lru() macro (clean up)
[2/10] ... nid/zid helper function for cgroup
[3/10] ... introduce per-zone object for memory controller and add
active/inactive counter.
[4/10] ... calculate mapper_ratio per cgroup (for memory reclaim)
[5/10] ... calculate active/inactive imbalance per cgroup (based on [3])
[6/10] ... remember reclaim priority in memory controller
[7/10] ... calculate the number of pages to be reclaimed per cgroup
[8/10] ... modifies vmscan.c to isolate global-lru-reclaim and
memory-cgroup-reclaim in obvious manner.
(this patch uses functions defined in [4 - 7])
[9/10] ... implement per-zone-lru for cgroup (based on [3])
[10/10] ... implement per-zone lru lock for cgroup (based on [3][9])
Any comments are welcome.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-27 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-27 2:55 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2007-11-27 2:58 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [1/10] add scan_global_lru macro KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 2:59 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [2/10] nid/zid helper function for cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 3:00 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-28 21:19 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-11-29 1:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-29 2:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-29 3:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-29 3:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-29 3:19 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2007-11-29 3:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-29 3:33 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2007-11-29 3:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 3:01 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [4/10] calculate mapper_ratio per cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 3:03 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [5/10] calculate active/inactive imbalance " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 3:04 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [6/10] remember reclaim priority in memory cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 3:06 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [7/10] calculate the number of pages to be scanned per cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 3:08 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [8/10] modifies vmscan.c for isolate globa/cgroup lru activity KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 3:10 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [9/10] per zone lru for cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-27 3:11 ` [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [10/10] per-zone-lock " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071127115525.e9779108.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox