From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:26:48 +0000 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask Message-ID: <20071120212647.GA18867@csn.ul.ie> References: <20071109143226.23540.12907.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20071109143426.23540.44459.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20071120141953.GB32313@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com, nacc@us.ibm.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: On (20/11/07 12:18), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > Went back and revisited this. Allocating them at boot-time is below but > > essentially it is a silly and it makes sense to just have two zonelists > > where one of them is for __GFP_THISNODE. Implementation wise, this involves > > dropping the last patch in the set and the overall result is still a reduction > > in the number of zonelists. > > Allright with me. Andrew could we get this patchset merged? > They will not merge cleanly with a recent tree. I expect to be ready to post a new set when regression tests complete later this evening. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org