From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "containers@lists.osdl.org" <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [9/10] per-zone-lru for memory cgroup
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:35:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071119153549.d6f6f1de.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47412B5B.80409@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:51:15 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > =
> > /cgroup/group_A/group_A_1
> > . /group_A_2
> > /group_A_3
> > (LRU(s) will be used for maintaining parent/child groups.)
> >
>
> The LRU's will be shared, my vision is
>
> LRU
> ^ ^
> | |
> Mem-----+ +----Mem
>
>
> That two or more mem_cgroup's can refer to the same LRU list and have
> their own resource counters. This setup will be used in the case
> of a hierarchy, so that a child can share memory with its parent
> and have it's own limit.
>
> The mem_cgroup will basically then only contain a reference
> to the LRU list.
>
Hmm, interesting.
Then,
group_A_1's usage + group_A_2's usage + group_A_3's usgae < group_A's limit.
group_A_1, group_A_2, group_A_3 has its own limit.
In plan.
I wonder if we want rich control functions, we need "share" or "priority" among
childs. (but maybe this will be complicated one.)
Thank you for explanation.
Regards,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-19 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-16 10:11 [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [0/10] introduction KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-16 10:14 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [1/10] add scan_global_lru() macro KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-17 9:03 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-16 10:16 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [2/10] add nid/zid function for page_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-17 9:15 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-19 1:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-16 10:17 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [3/10] add per zone active/inactive counter to mem_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-17 16:07 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-16 10:18 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [4/10] calculate mapped ratio for memory cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-17 16:12 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-19 1:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-22 8:34 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2007-11-22 8:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-22 8:46 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2007-11-22 13:31 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2007-11-16 10:22 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [5/10] calculate active/inactive balance " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-16 10:23 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [6/10] remember reclaim priority " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-16 10:24 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [7/10] calculate reclaim scan number " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-16 10:25 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [8/10] changes in vmscan.c KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-17 17:37 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-16 10:26 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [9/10] per-zone-lru for memory cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-17 17:51 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-19 1:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-11-19 6:21 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-19 6:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2007-11-19 8:34 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-16 10:27 ` [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [10/10] per-zone-lock " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071119153549.d6f6f1de.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox