linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Subject: Re: [patch] nfs: use GFP_NOFS preloads for radix-tree insertion
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:39:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071114153937.GA3779@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195031187.6924.1.camel@twins>

On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:06:27AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 05:20 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:55:45AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 07:56 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > Here is the NFS version. I guess Trond should ack it before you pick it
> > > > up.
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > 
> > > > NFS should use GFP_NOFS mode radix tree preloads rather than GFP_ATOMIC
> > > > allocations at radix-tree insertion-time. This is important to reduce the
> > > > atomic memory requirement.
> > > 
> > > In another mail you said:
> > > 
> > > > Anyway we can also simplify the code because the insertion can't fail with a
> > > > preload.
> > > 
> > > Can we please avoid adding strict dependencies on that as the preload
> > > API is unsupportable in -rt.
> > 
> > You can surely support it. You just have to do per-thread preloads if you
> > want preemption left on.
> 
> Well, true, but that would mean adding stuff to task_struct, not the end
> of the world I guess.
> 
> But as it is leaving the error handling on each individual
> radix_tree_insert() allows us to just use GFP_KERNEL for everything.

Hmm, then you reintroduce the lock ordering which I got rid of. Not that
it's a particularly big deal in this case. I don't think you should noop
fundamental things like this just because they turn preempt off. At any
rate, it's not something that mainline can really be concerned with...


> The other, nicer option, is to do preload on the radix_tree_context
> object instead.

I don't know if you'd call it nicer... at least, not as nice as what's
upstream. So it seems like you'd have to have a custom solution anyway,
given that per-cpu preloads are probably the best we can do upstream.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-14 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-08  0:43 [patch] radix-tree: avoid atomic allocations for preloaded insertions Nick Piggin
2007-11-08  1:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08  1:34   ` David Miller, Andrew Morton
2007-11-08  1:41     ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08  1:45       ` David Miller, Andrew Morton
2007-11-08  1:37   ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08  3:02     ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08  3:16       ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08  4:12         ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08  4:54           ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08  5:02             ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08  5:44               ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08  6:02                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08  6:54                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08  6:56                   ` [patch] nfs: use GFP_NOFS preloads for radix-tree insertion Nick Piggin
2007-11-13 10:55                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-14  4:20                       ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14  9:06                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-14 15:39                           ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-11-08 11:57           ` [patch] radix-tree: avoid atomic allocations for preloaded insertions Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-08 20:37             ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 20:47               ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071114153937.GA3779@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox