From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 18:39:30 +0000 Subject: Re: Plans for Onezonelist patch series ??? Message-ID: <20071108183930.GB23882@skynet.ie> References: <20071107011130.382244340@sgi.com> <1194535612.6214.9.camel@localhost> <1194537674.5295.8.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1194537674.5295.8.camel@localhost> From: mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Christoph Lameter , akpm@linux-foundatin.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On (08/11/07 11:01), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce: > Mel [anyone?] > > Do you know what the plans are for your "onezonelist" patch series? > I was holding off trying to add new features to current mainline or -mm as there were a number of stability issues and one-zonelist touches a number of areas. Minimally, I was waiting for another -mm to come out and rebase to that. I'll rebase to latest git tomorrow, see how that looks and post it if passes regression tests on Monday. > Are they going into -mm for, maybe, .25? Or have they been dropped. > > I carry the last posting in my mempolicy tree--sometimes below my > patches; sometimes above. Our patches touch some of the same places in > mempolicy.c and require reject resolution when changing the order. I > can save Andrew some work if I knew that your patches were going to be > in the next -mm by holding off and doing the rebase myself. > The one-zonelist stuff is likely to be more controversial than what you are doing. It may be best if the one-zonelist patches are based on top of yours than the other way around. Thanks -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org