linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/10] split anon and file LRUs
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:23:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071106212305.6aa3a4fe@bree.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711061808460.5249@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> > The current version only has the infrastructure.  Large changes to
> > the page replacement policy will follow later.
> 
> Hmmmm.. I'd rather see where we are going.

http://linux-mm.org/PageReplacementDesign

> One other way of addressing many of these issues is to allow large page sizes
> on the LRU which will reduce the number of entities that have to be managed.

Linus seems to have vetoed that (unless I am mistaken), so the
chances of that happening soon are probably not very large.

Also, a factor 16 increase in page size is not going to help
if memory sizes also increase by a factor 16, since we already 
have trouble with today's memory sizes.

> Both approaches actually would work in tandem.
 
Hence, this patch series.

> > TODO:
> > - have any mlocked and ramfs pages live off of the LRU list,
> >   so we do not need to scan these pages
> 
> I think that is the most urgent issue at hand. At least for us.

For some workloads this is the most urgent change, indeed.
Since the patches for this already exist, integrating them
is at the top of my list.  Expect this to be integrated into
the split VM patch series by the end of this week.

> > - switch to SEQ replacement for the anon LRU lists, so the
> >   worst case number of pages to scan is reduced greatly.
> 
> No idea what that is?

See http://linux-mm.org/PageReplacementDesign

> > - figure out if the file LRU lists need page replacement
> >   changes to help with worst case scenarios
> 
> We do not have an accepted standard load. So how would we figure that one 
> out?

The current worst case is where we need to scan all of memory, 
just to find a few pages we can swap out.  With the effects of
lock contention figured in, this can take hours on huge systems.

In order to make the VM more scalable, we need to find acceptable
pages to swap out with low complexity in the VM.  The "worst case"
above refers to the upper bound on how much work the VM needs to
do in order to get something evicted from the page cache or swapped
out.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-07  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-03 22:42 Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/10] move isolate_lru_page to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:13   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-03 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 2/10] free swap space entries if vm_swap_full() Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:20   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  2:48     ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:23   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  2:55     ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  3:02       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  3:17         ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  3:26           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07 14:35             ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07 18:06               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07 18:17                 ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07 18:18                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-03 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 4/10] debug page_file_cache Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 22:56 ` [RFC PATCH 5/10] use an indexed array for LRU lists and variables Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:01 ` [RFC PATCH 6/10] split anon and file LRUs Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:28   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  3:00     ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:02 ` [RFC PATCH 7/10] clean up the LRU array arithmetic Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:03 ` [RFC PATCH 8/10] make split VM and lumpy reclaim work together Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:04 ` [RFC PATCH 9/10] split VM and memory controllers Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:06 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] add swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:11 ` [RFC PATCH 0/10] split anon and file LRUs Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  2:23   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2007-11-07  2:40     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  2:51       ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07 17:59         ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-07 18:16           ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071106212305.6aa3a4fe@bree.surriel.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox