From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend2] rd: fix data corruption on memory pressure
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:34:45 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710300134.45950.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710291517.44332.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 01:17, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Nick, Eric, Andrew,
>
> we now have passed rc1. That means that Erics or Nicks rd rewrite is no
> longer an option for 2.6.24. If I followed the last thread correctly all
> alternative patches have one of the following issue
> - too big for post rc1
Yeah, I don't think the rewrites were ever intended for 2.6.24
anyway...
> - break reiserfs and maybe others
> - call into vfs while being unrelated
>
> So this is a resend of my patch, which is in my opinion the simplest fix
> for the data corruption problem.
> The patch was tested by our test department, thanks to Oliver Paukstadt and
> Thorsten Diehl.
>
> ---
>
> Subject: [PATCH] rd: fix data corruption on memory pressure
> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>
> We have seen ramdisk based install systems, where some pages of mapped
> libraries and programs were suddendly zeroed under memory pressure. This
> should not happen, as the ramdisk avoids freeing its pages by keeping them
> dirty all the time.
>
> It turns out that there is a case, where the VM makes a ramdisk page clean,
> without telling the ramdisk driver.
> On memory pressure shrink_zone runs and it starts to run
> shrink_active_list. There is a check for buffer_heads_over_limit, and if
> true, pagevec_strip is called. pagevec_strip calls try_to_release_page. If
> the mapping has no releasepage callback, try_to_free_buffers is called.
> try_to_free_buffers has now a special logic for some file systems to make a
> dirty page clean, if all buffers are clean. Thats what happened in our test
> case.
>
> The simplest solution is to provide a noop-releasepage callback for the
> ramdisk driver. This avoids try_to_free_buffers for ramdisk pages.
I think this is the least intrusive change that is least likely
to break rd, or any other kernel code, that we've seen. It really
should go in 2.6.24, IMO.
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rd.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/block/rd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/block/rd.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/block/rd.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,18 @@ static int ramdisk_set_page_dirty(struct
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * releasepage is called by pagevec_strip/try_to_release_page if
> + * buffers_heads_over_limit is true. Without a releasepage function
> + * try_to_free_buffers is called instead. That can unset the dirty
> + * bit of our ram disk pages, which will be eventually freed, even
> + * if the page is still in use.
> + */
> +static int ramdisk_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t dummy)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct address_space_operations ramdisk_aops = {
> .readpage = ramdisk_readpage,
> .prepare_write = ramdisk_prepare_write,
> @@ -196,6 +208,7 @@ static const struct address_space_operat
> .writepage = ramdisk_writepage,
> .set_page_dirty = ramdisk_set_page_dirty,
> .writepages = ramdisk_writepages,
> + .releasepage = ramdisk_releasepage,
> };
>
> static int rd_blkdev_pagecache_IO(int rw, struct bio_vec *vec, sector_t
> sector,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-29 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-29 14:17 Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-29 14:34 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710300134.45950.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox