From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:07:02 -0400 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: Memory controller merge (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24) Message-ID: <20071010170702.34fb3eee@cuia.boston.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4701C737.8070906@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20071001142222.fcaa8d57.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4701C737.8070906@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List List-ID: On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:51:11 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > I was hopeful of getting the bare minimal infrastructure for memory > control in mainline, so that review is easy and additional changes > can be well reviewed as well. I am not yet convinced that the way the memory controller code and lumpy reclaim have been merged is correct. I am combing through the code now and will send in a patch when I figure out if/what is wrong. I ran into this because I'm trying to merge the split VM code up to the latest -mm... -- All Rights Reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org