From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:57:46 -0700 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [patch -mm 7/5] oom: filter tasklist dump by mem_cgroup Message-Id: <20070925205746.dd74a887.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830709251822q371c4a62rfdf8911720edb86c@mail.gmail.com> References: <6599ad830709251100n352028beraddaf2ac33ea8f6c@mail.gmail.com> <20070925181442.aeb7b205.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830709251822q371c4a62rfdf8911720edb86c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Paul Menage Cc: rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, clameter@sgi.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Paul M wrote: > You could print any tasks that share memory nodes (in their cpuset) > with the OOMing task. Huh? I'm mystified. Why would printing tasks help avoid choosing the wrong task to oom kill? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org