From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:30:44 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/14] Reclaim Scalability: Define page_anon() function Message-Id: <20070919093044.e4b378d0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1190127886.5035.10.camel@localhost> References: <20070914205359.6536.98017.sendpatchset@localhost> <20070914205425.6536.69946.sendpatchset@localhost> <20070918105842.5218db50.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <1190127886.5035.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mel@csn.ul.ie, clameter@sgi.com, riel@redhat.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, eric.whitney@hp.com, npiggin@suse.de List-ID: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:04:46 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > > Hi, it seems the name 'page_anon()' is not clear.. > > In my understanding, an anonymous page is a MAP_ANONYMOUS page. > > Can't we have better name ? > > Hi, Kame-san: > > I'm open to a "better name". Probably Rik, too -- it's his original > name. > > How about one of these? > > - page_is_swap_backed() or page_is_backed_by_swap_space() > - page_needs_swap_space() or page_uses_swap_space() > - pageNeedSwapSpaceToBeReclaimable() [X11-style :-)] > My point is that the word "anonymous" is traditionally used for user's work memory. and page_anon() page seems not to be swap-backed always. (you includes ramfs etc..) Hmm...how about page_anon_cache() ? But finally, please name it as you like. sorry for nitpicks. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org