Re: VM/VFS bug with large amount of memory and file systems?

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:04:05 +0100 Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
wrote:

> They files  
> are attached this time rather than inlined so people don't complain  
> about line wrapping!  (No doubt people will not complain about them  
> being attached!  )-:)

I switched mailer after I learnt about flowed stuffs. Still,
appreciated.

> If I read it correctly it appears all of low memory is eaten up by  
> buffer_heads.
> 
> <quote>
> # name            <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab>  
> <pagesperslab>
> : tunables <limit> <batchcount> <sharedfactor> : slabdata  
> <active_slabs> <num_s
> labs> <sharedavail>
> buffer_head       12569528 12569535     56   67    1 : tunables   
> 120   60    8 :
> slabdata 187605 187605      0
> </quote>
> 
> That is 671MiB of low memory in buffer_heads.
> 
> But why is the kernel not reclaiming them by getting rid of the page  
> cache pages they are attached to or even leaving the pages around but  
> killing their buffers?

Well, you see, you have this very odd configuration where:

11GB highmem
 1GB normal

pagecache pages go into highmem
buggerheads go into normal

I'm guessing there is no pressure at all on zone_highmem so the
kernel will not try to reclaim pagecache. And because the pagecache
pages are happily sitting there, the buggerheads are pinned and do not
get reclaimed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>