From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mel@csn.ul.ie, clameter@sgi.com,
riel@redhat.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, eric.whitney@hp.com, npiggin@suse.de
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 11/14] Reclaim Scalability: swap backed pages are nonreclaimable when no swap space available
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:55:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070914205512.6536.89432.sendpatchset@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070914205359.6536.98017.sendpatchset@localhost>
PATCH/RFC 11/14 Reclaim Scalability: treat swap backed pages as
non-reclaimable when no swap space is available.
Against: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1
Move swap backed pages [anon, shmem/tmpfs] to noreclaim list when
nr_swap_pages goes to zero. Use Rik van Riel's page_anon()
function in page_reclaimable() to detect swap backed pages.
Depends on NORECLAIM_NO_SWAP Kconfig sub-option of NORECLAIM
TODO: Splice zones' noreclaim list when "sufficient" swap becomes
available--either by being freed by other pages or by additional
swap being added. How much is "sufficient" swap? Don't want to
splice huge noreclaim lists every time a swap page gets freed.
Might want to track per zone "unswappable" pages as a separate
statistic to make intelligent decisions here. That will complicate
page_reclaimable() and non-reclaimable page culling in vmscan. E.g.,
where to keep "reason" while page is on the "hold" list? Not
necessary if we don't cull in shrink_active_list(), but then we get
to visit non-reclaimable pages more often.
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
mm/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
mm/vmscan.c | 9 +++++++--
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: Linux/mm/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- Linux.orig/mm/Kconfig 2007-09-14 10:23:52.000000000 -0400
+++ Linux/mm/Kconfig 2007-09-14 10:23:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -215,3 +215,14 @@ config NORECLAIM_ANON_VMA
anonymous pages in such tasks are very expensive [sometimes almost
impossible] to reclaim. Treating them as non-reclaimable avoids
the overhead of attempting to reclaim them.
+
+config NORECLAIM_NO_SWAP
+ bool "Exclude anon/shmem pages when no swap space available"
+ depends on NORECLAIM
+ help
+ Treats swap backed pages [anonymous, shmem, tmpfs] as non-reclaimable
+ when no swap space exists. Removing these pages from the LRU lists
+ avoids the overhead of attempting to reclaim them. Pages marked
+ non-reclaimable for this reason will become reclaimable again when/if
+ sufficient swap space is added to the system.
+
Index: Linux/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- Linux.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2007-09-14 10:23:52.000000000 -0400
+++ Linux/mm/vmscan.c 2007-09-14 10:23:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -2169,8 +2169,9 @@ int anon_vma_reclaim_limit = DEFAULT_ANO
*
* Reasons page might not be reclaimable:
* 1) page's mapping marked non-reclaimable
- * 2) anon_vma [if any] has too many related vmas
- * [more TBD. e.g., anon page and no swap available, page mlocked, ...]
+ * 2) anon/shmem/tmpfs page, but no swap space avail
+ * 3) anon_vma [if any] has too many related vmas
+ * [more TBD. e.g., page mlocked, ...]
*
* TODO: specify locking assumptions
*/
@@ -2182,6 +2183,10 @@ int page_reclaimable(struct page *page,
if (mapping_non_reclaimable(page_mapping(page)))
return 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NORECLAIM_NO_SWAP
+ if (page_anon(page) && !PageSwapCache(page) && !nr_swap_pages)
+ return 0;
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NORECLAIM_ANON_VMA
if (PageAnon(page)) {
struct anon_vma *anon_vma;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-14 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-14 20:53 [PATCH/RFC 0/14] Page Reclaim Scalability Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/14] Reclaim Scalability: Convert anon_vma lock to read/write lock Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 11:02 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-18 2:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-09-18 11:01 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-18 14:57 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-18 15:37 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-18 20:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-20 10:19 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/14] Reclaim Scalability: convert inode i_mmap_lock to reader/writer lock Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 12:53 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-20 1:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-09-20 14:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-20 14:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/14] Reclaim Scalability: move isolate_lru_page() to vmscan.c Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 21:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-15 1:55 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-17 14:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 9:20 ` Balbir Singh
2007-09-17 19:19 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/14] Reclaim Scalability: Define page_anon() function Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-15 2:00 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-17 13:19 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-18 1:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-09-18 2:27 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-18 2:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-09-18 15:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-18 19:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 0:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-09-19 16:58 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-20 0:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/14] Reclaim Scalability: Use an indexed array for LRU variables Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 13:40 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 14:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 14:39 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 18:58 ` Balbir Singh
2007-09-17 19:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 19:36 ` Balbir Singh
2007-09-17 19:36 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-17 20:21 ` Balbir Singh
2007-09-17 21:01 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/14] Reclaim Scalability: "No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure" Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 22:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 15:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-18 9:54 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-18 19:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 11:11 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-19 18:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 6:00 ` Balbir Singh
2007-09-19 14:47 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 7/14] Reclaim Scalability: Non-reclaimable page statistics Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 1:56 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 8/14] Reclaim Scalability: Ram Disk Pages are non-reclaimable Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 1:57 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-17 14:40 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 18:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-14 20:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 9/14] Reclaim Scalability: SHM_LOCKED pages are nonreclaimable Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 2:18 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-14 20:55 ` [PATCH/RFC 10/14] Reclaim Scalability: track anon_vma "related vmas" Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 2:52 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-17 15:52 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:55 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-09-17 2:53 ` [PATCH/RFC 11/14] Reclaim Scalability: swap backed pages are nonreclaimable when no swap space available Rik van Riel
2007-09-18 17:46 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-18 20:01 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-19 14:55 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-18 2:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-09-18 15:47 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:55 ` [PATCH/RFC 12/14] Reclaim Scalability: Non-reclaimable Mlock'ed pages Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:55 ` [PATCH/RFC 13/14] Reclaim Scalability: Handle Mlock'ed pages during map/unmap and truncate Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:55 ` [PATCH/RFC 14/14] Reclaim Scalability: cull non-reclaimable anon pages in fault path Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 21:11 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/14] Page Reclaim Scalability Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-14 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-14 22:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-15 0:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-17 6:44 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070914205512.6536.89432.sendpatchset@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox