linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, ak@suse.de, clameter@sgi.com
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] Use macros instead of static inline functions for zonelist iterators
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:53:39 +0100 (IST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070831205339.22283.40267.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070831205139.22283.71284.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie>

gcc-3.4 and probably older compiler versions produce worse code for static
inline functions than they do for macros. Due to the fact the allocator
path is a hotpath, there is approximately a 0.2% performance difference on
kernbench's System CPU times when using static inline functions. This is
not a problem on gcc 4.1.

This patch should be ignored because the static inline functions come with
type-checking and there doesn't need to be concern about macro arguements
having funky side-effects. However, as the performance problem is noticable
on older compilers, the compiler version and this patch should be checked
as the potential source and solution to a performance regression.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---

 include/linux/gfp.h    |    8 ++++----
 include/linux/mmzone.h |   31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1-040_use_one_zonelist/include/linux/gfp.h linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1-045_macro_not_inline/include/linux/gfp.h
--- linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1-040_use_one_zonelist/include/linux/gfp.h	2007-08-31 17:22:55.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1-045_macro_not_inline/include/linux/gfp.h	2007-08-31 17:23:10.000000000 +0100
@@ -156,11 +156,11 @@ static inline gfp_t set_migrateflags(gfp
  *
  * For the normal case of non-DISCONTIGMEM systems the NODE_DATA() gets
  * optimized to &contig_page_data at compile-time.
+ *
+ * See the explanation above zonelist_zone() in include/linux/mmzone.h as
+ * to why this is a macro and not a static inline
  */
-static inline struct zonelist *node_zonelist(int nid)
-{
-	return &NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelist;
-}
+#define node_zonelist(nid) (&NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelist)
 
 #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_FREE_PAGE
 static inline void arch_free_page(struct page *page, int order) { }
diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1-040_use_one_zonelist/include/linux/mmzone.h linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1-045_macro_not_inline/include/linux/mmzone.h
--- linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1-040_use_one_zonelist/include/linux/mmzone.h	2007-08-31 18:06:59.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1-045_macro_not_inline/include/linux/mmzone.h	2007-08-31 17:23:10.000000000 +0100
@@ -687,15 +687,16 @@ extern struct zone *next_zone(struct zon
 #endif
 
 #define ZONELIST_ZONEIDX_MASK ((1UL << ZONES_SHIFT) - 1)
-static inline struct zone *zonelist_zone(unsigned long zone_addr)
-{
-	return (struct zone *)(zone_addr & ~ZONELIST_ZONEIDX_MASK);
-}
 
-static inline int zonelist_zone_idx(unsigned long zone_addr)
-{
-	return zone_addr & ZONELIST_ZONEIDX_MASK;
-}
+/*
+ * Subtle: These are macros, not static inlines because gcc 3.4 at least
+ * produces worse code with static inline functions. The effect is about 0.4%
+ * regression in kernbench tests. The problem doesn't appear to exist on
+ * gcc 4.1
+ */
+#define zonelist_zone_idx(zone_addr) ((zone_addr) & ZONELIST_ZONEIDX_MASK)
+#define zonelist_zone(zone_addr) \
+	((struct zone *)((zone_addr) & ~ZONELIST_ZONEIDX_MASK))
 
 static inline unsigned long encode_zone_idx(struct zone *zone)
 {
@@ -706,13 +707,19 @@ static inline unsigned long encode_zone_
 	return encoded;
 }
 
-static inline int zone_in_nodemask(unsigned long zone_addr, nodemask_t *nodes)
-{
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	return node_isset(zonelist_zone(zone_addr)->node, *nodes);
+#define zone_in_nodemask(zone_addr, nodes) \
+	(node_isset(zonelist_zone(zone_addr)->node, *nodes))
 #else
-	return 1;
+#define zone_in_nodemask(zone_addr, nodes) (1)
 #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
+
+static inline int zone_in_nodemask(unsigned long zone_addr, nodemask_t *nodes)
+{
+	if (NUMA_BUILD)
+		return node_isset(zonelist_zone(zone_addr)->node, *nodes);
+
+	return 1;
 }
 
 /* Returns the first zone at or below highest_zoneidx in a zonelist */

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-31 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-31 20:51 [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5 Mel Gorman
2007-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] Use zonelists instead of zones when direct reclaiming pages Mel Gorman
2007-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] Use two zonelist that are filtered by GFP mask Mel Gorman
2007-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] Embed zone_id information within the zonelist->zones pointer Mel Gorman
2007-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask Mel Gorman
2007-09-01  0:30   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 20:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask Mel Gorman
2007-09-01  0:34   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-02 11:10     ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-01  0:35   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 20:53 ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070831205339.22283.40267.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox