From: Juergen Beisert <juergen127@kreuzholzen.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Drake <ddrake@brontes3d.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: speeding up swapoff
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:12:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708291712.35967.juergen127@kreuzholzen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1188398683.22156.77.camel@localhost>
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 16:44, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 07:30 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > My experiments show that when there is not much free physical memory,
> > > swapoff moves pages out of swap at a rate of approximately 5mb/sec.
> >
> > sounds like about disk speed (at random-seek IO pattern)
>
> We are only using 'standard' seagate SATA disks, but I would have
> thought much more performance (40+ mb/sec) would be reachable.
>
> > before you go there... is this a "real life" problem? Or just a
> > mostly-artificial corner case? (the answer to that obviously is
> > relevant for the 'should we really care' question)
>
> It's more-or-less a real life problem. We have an interactive
> application which, when triggered by the user, performs rendering tasks
> which must operate in real-time. In attempt to secure performance, we
> want to ensure everything is memory resident and that nothing might be
> swapped out during the process. So, we run swapoff at that time.
Did you play with mlock()?
Juergen
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-29 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-29 13:29 Daniel Drake
2007-08-29 14:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-29 14:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-08-29 16:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-08-29 16:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-08-29 14:44 ` Daniel Drake
2007-08-29 15:12 ` Juergen Beisert [this message]
2007-08-30 15:57 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-01 22:20 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-29 15:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-08-29 15:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-08-30 8:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-30 10:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-08-30 15:05 ` Daniel Drake
2007-08-29 16:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
[not found] <fa.j/pO3mTWDugTdvZ3XNr9XpvgzPQ@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ed9fasZXOwVCrbffkPQTX7G3a7g@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa./NZA3biuO1+qW5pW8ybdZMDWcZs@ifi.uio.no>
2007-08-30 1:37 ` Robert Hancock
2007-08-30 13:55 ` Helge Hafting
2007-08-30 14:06 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-08-30 14:06 ` Helge Hafting
2007-08-30 14:14 ` Xavier Bestel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708291712.35967.juergen127@kreuzholzen.de \
--to=juergen127@kreuzholzen.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ddrake@brontes3d.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox