From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: add end_buffer_read helper function
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:00:59 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070818110059.GB10969@dnb.sw.ru> (raw)
This patch just move duplicated code from end_buffer_read_XXX
methods to separate helper function.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
---
fs/buffer.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index f95e444..6756524 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -118,10 +118,14 @@ static void buffer_io_error(struct buffer_head *bh)
}
/*
- * Default synchronous end-of-IO handler.. Just mark it up-to-date and
- * unlock the buffer. This is what ll_rw_block uses too.
+ * End-of-IO handler helper function which does not touch the bh after
+ * unlocking it.
+ * Note: unlock_buffer() sort-of does touch the bh after unlocking it, but
+ * a race there is benign: unlock_buffer() only use the bh's address for
+ * hashing after unlocking the buffer, so it doesn't actually touch the bh
+ * itself.
*/
-void end_buffer_read_sync(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
+static void __end_buffer_read_notouch(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
{
if (uptodate) {
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
@@ -130,6 +134,15 @@ void end_buffer_read_sync(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
clear_buffer_uptodate(bh);
}
unlock_buffer(bh);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Default synchronous end-of-IO handler.. Just mark it up-to-date and
+ * unlock the buffer. This is what ll_rw_block uses too.
+ */
+void end_buffer_read_sync(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
+{
+ __end_buffer_read_notouch(bh, uptodate);
put_bh(bh);
}
@@ -2366,21 +2379,10 @@ out_unlock:
* nobh_prepare_write()'s prereads are special: the buffer_heads are freed
* immediately, while under the page lock. So it needs a special end_io
* handler which does not touch the bh after unlocking it.
- *
- * Note: unlock_buffer() sort-of does touch the bh after unlocking it, but
- * a race there is benign: unlock_buffer() only use the bh's address for
- * hashing after unlocking the buffer, so it doesn't actually touch the bh
- * itself.
*/
static void end_buffer_read_nobh(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
{
- if (uptodate) {
- set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
- } else {
- /* This happens, due to failed READA attempts. */
- clear_buffer_uptodate(bh);
- }
- unlock_buffer(bh);
+ __end_buffer_read_notouch(bh, uptodate);
}
/*
--
1.5.2.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
reply other threads:[~2007-08-18 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070818110059.GB10969@dnb.sw.ru \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox